Motorola Razr+ is the corporate’s newest and best clamshell folding telephone. That system is known as Motorola Razr 40 Extremely exterior the US, by the best way. Having stated that, we have in contrast it to various clamshell foldable telephones, together with the Galaxy Z Flip 4. As we look forward to the Flip 5 to launch, let’s examine Motorola’s newest providing. with an older Samsung system. On this article, we’ll examine Motorola Razr+ with Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3.
A few of you should still personal a Galaxy Z Flip 3 and would possibly contemplate upgrading, as we’re virtually two years into it because it got here out. Nicely, if you’re considering of switching to Motorola Razr+, this comparability may be useful. We’ll listing their specs first, then transfer on to match their design, show, efficiency, battery life, digicam, and audio efficiency.
Specs
Motorola Razr+ | Samsung Galaxy Z flip 3 | |
Display measurement | Essential: 6.9-inch FullHD + LTPO AMOLED (foldable, 165Hz) Sub (Lid): 3.6-inch AMOLED show (flat, 144Hz) |
Essential: 6.7-inch fullHD+ Dynamic AMOLED show (foldable, 120Hz) Sub (Lid): 1.9-inch Tremendous AMOLED show (flat, 60Hz) |
Display decision | Essential: 2640 x 1080 Secondary (Cowl): 1056 x 1066 |
Essential: 2640 x 1080 Sub (Cowl): 260 x 512 |
SoC | 1st technology Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 |
smack | 8GB/12GB | 8GB (LPDDR5) |
Warehouse | 256GB/512GB (UFS 3.1), not expandable | 128GB/256GB (UFS 3.1); cannot develop |
Rear digicam | 12MP (f/1.5 aperture, 1.4um pixel measurement, OIS, PDAF) 13MP (f/2.2 aperture, 108-degree FoV, 1.12um pixel measurement) |
12MP (f/1.8 aperture, 27mm lens, 1.4um pixel measurement, OIS, Twin Pixel PDAF) 12MP (f/2.2 aperture, 123 diploma viewing angle, 1.12um pixel measurement, tremendous large angle) |
Entrance digicam | 32MP (f/2.4 aperture, 0.7um pixel measurement) | 10MP (f/2.4 aperture, 26mm lens, 1.22um pixel measurement) |
Battery | 3,800mAh, non-removable, 30W quick wired charging, 5W wi-fi charging Charger included (not US) |
3,330mAh, non-removable, 25W wired charging, 11W wi-fi charging, 4.5W reverse wi-fi charging Charger not included |
measurement | When unfolded: 170.8 x 74 x 7mm When folded: 88.4 x 74 x 15.1mm |
When unfolded: 166 x 72.2 x 6.9mm When folded: 86.4 x 72.2 x 15.9-17.1mm |
Weight | 184.5/188.5 grams | 183 grams |
join | 5G, LTE, NFC, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, USB Sort-C | 5G, LTE, NFC, Bluetooth 5.1, Wi-Fi, USB Sort-C |
Shield | Facet fingerprint scanner | Facet fingerprint scanner |
working system | Android 13 | Android 11 (upgradable to Android 12) One 3.5 . person interface |
Value | $999 | $749.99 |
Purchase | Amazon | SAMSUNG |
Motorola Razr+ vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3: Design
Each the Motorola Razr+ and the Galaxy Z Flip 3 are product of steel and glass. Be aware, nevertheless, that the Razr+ additionally is available in a variant with a vegan leather-based backplate. The Motorola Razr+ is barely taller and wider than the Galaxy Z Flip 3. They’re the identical thickness when unfolded, however when folded, the Razr+ is thinner. Please observe that the Motorola Razr+ has a bigger most important display screen, so the bigger complete space is no surprise.
The gadgets have the identical weight, the distinction lies in a couple of grams. Each telephones have a digicam gap that reveals up within the heart on the primary display screen. The bezels round that panel are fairly skinny on each gadgets. Nevertheless, once we flip them over, you may discover a major distinction. The Motorola Razr+ has a a lot bigger 3.6-inch show there, whereas the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a 1.9-inch show.
Each telephones have two cameras on the again, though they’ve completely different orientations. The hinge is effectively hidden by each telephones when they’re unfolded. Each gadgets are fairly slippery within the hand, apart from the vegan leather-based variant of the Motorola Razr+. That one provides a bit extra grip. The Motorola Razr+ additionally provides a water-resistant coating, whereas the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an IPX8 certification for water resistance. Each really feel like high quality telephones (within the hand), however the Motorola Razr+ appears to be like extra fashionable, that is exhausting to disclaim.
Motorola Razr+ vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3: Display
The Motorola Razr+ has a 6.9-inch fullHD+ (2640 x 1080) LTPO AMOLED foldable show. That panel can mission 1 billion colours and has a 165Hz refresh fee. HDR10+ content material is supported right here, and we’re 1,400 nit peak brightness. The second panel on the telephone measures 3.6 inches and provides a decision of 1056 x 1066. It is an AMOLED panel with a 144Hz refresh fee and may mission 1 billion colours, whereas additionally supporting internals. HDR10+ content material. This panel has a most brightness of as much as 1,100 nits. It’s lined by Gorilla Glass Victor.
![Review Motorola Razr plus 2023 AM AH30](https://www.androidheadlines.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Motorola-Razr-plus-2023-review-AM-AH30.webp)
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a 6.7-inch fullHD+ (2640 x 1080) foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X show. That show has a 120Hz refresh fee and helps HDR10+ content material. It could additionally attain a most brightness of 1,200 nits. However, the exterior display screen is a 1.9-inch Tremendous AMOLED panel. It has a decision of 260 x 512 pixels. It is a 60Hz show.
The house display screen is actually good on each smartphones. The show on the Motorola Razr+ has the next refresh fee, however in some instances it solely prompts throughout gaming and media use. Each most important screens have good viewing angles and are pleasantly vivid, they usually additionally supply deep blacks. Contact response is sweet on each.
Even so, the Motorola Razr+’s exterior show is not nearly as good because the one on the Galaxy Z Flip 3. Not solely is it a lot bigger, nevertheless it additionally provides the next decision and better refresh fee. On high of that, you may run any app on that display screen, which is not attainable on the Galaxy Z Flip 3’s exterior panel, which will not even shut.
Motorola Razr+ vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3: Efficiency
There’s a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SoC included contained in the Motorola Razr+. However, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 consists of the Snapdragon 888 processor, an older chip. The previous is a 4nm processor, whereas the latter is a 5nm processor. Each had been Qualcomm’s flagship processors sooner or later. You will discover as much as 12GB of LPDDR5 RAM contained in the Motorola Razr+, whereas the Galaxy Z Flip 3 provides 8GB of LPDDR5 RAM. Each telephones assist UFS 3.1 storage.
So how is the efficiency? Nicely, the efficiency on the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is not unhealthy in any respect, however the Motorola Razr+ provides much more in that respect. For comparability, the Motorola Razr+ feels smoother throughout use and launches apps barely sooner. Nevertheless, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 nonetheless performs effectively in that respect. You’ll be able to play video games on each telephones, however in case you’re seeking to bounce into a few of the extra graphically intensive titles, the Motorola Razr+ is the safer guess.
Motorola Razr+ vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3: Battery
A 3,800mAh battery is included contained in the Motorola Razr+. However, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a 3,300mAh battery. The Motorola Razr+ has a considerably bigger battery, nevertheless it additionally has a considerably bigger show. Does it supply higher battery life? Sure, that is proper, no less than that is the case with us. The battery lifetime of the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has improved a bit by way of updates, nevertheless it’s lower than what the Motorola Razr+ has to supply.
We had been capable of get round 7.5-8 hours of display screen time with the Motorola Razr+. Within the case of the Galaxy Z Flip 3, that length is nearer to about 4.5-5 hours with barely comparable utilization. The factor is, you’ll open the Galaxy Z Flip 3 extra actually because its exterior display screen could be very small and it would not allow you to do a lot. Again then, the exterior show of the Motorola Razr+ was a totally completely different story. Additionally, please observe that your mileage might differ as a consequence of various components. You may get a greater quantity of battery life than we did.
When it comes to charging capabilities, Motorola Razr+ helps 30W wired charging and 5W wi-fi charging. Galaxy Z Flip 3 helps 15W wired, 10W wi-fi charging and 4.5W reverse wi-fi charging. Motorola Razr+ comes with a charger in some markets, however not within the US. The Galaxy Z Flip 3, however, would not have a charger included in any market.
Motorola Razr+ vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3: Digicam
Motorola Razr+ has a 12-megapixel most important digicam and a 13-megapixel ultra-wide-angle digicam (108 levels FoV). The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a 12-megapixel most important digicam and a 12-megapixel ultra-wide-angle digicam (123-degree foV). Earlier than we begin, observe that the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is sort of two years previous at this level.
![Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G AM AH 21](https://www.androidheadlines.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Samsung-Galaxy-Z-Flip-3-5G-AM-AH-21.webp)
Having stated that, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 did not actually wow us with its digicam prowess when it launched. So one would suppose it will not beat the Motorola Razr+, and it does. The Motorola Razr+ actually has a strong digicam, though it’s miles from being among the finest digicam telephones. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 tends to extend the saturation a bit an excessive amount of and in some instances the photographs look actually bizarre due to that. On high of that, the sharpening could be a bit too sturdy.
The Motorola Razr+’s photographs may very well be a bit extra vibrant, they generally are inclined to look a bit blurry. Nevertheless, in comparison with the Galaxy Z Flip 3, they give the impression of being higher general. The Motorola Razr+ additionally performs higher in low mild because it balances the picture barely higher and handles neon avenue lights and indicators higher. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a considerably wider FoV on the ultra-wide-angle digicam, however the efficiency is not on par with the primary digicam.
sound
You’ll discover a set of stereo audio system on each smartphones. The truth is, the amount that the audio system present is sort of comparable. Sound high quality can be no completely different, fairly trustworthy. Each are ok.
What you will not discover on both telephone is an audio jack. You may be pressured to make use of the Sort-C port for the wired audio connection. In case you determine to go wi-fi, the Motorola Razr+ helps Bluetooth 5.3, whereas the Galaxy Z Flip 3 provides Bluetooth 5.1 assist.